Boards read dashboards. Investors read decks. Contracting officers read status reports. All three are claims. The evidence sits underneath, in the engineering systems themselves. Zamski reads it, with citations down to the specific PR, thread, and ticket.
You ask a question. Zamski answers from the company's own systems and keeps watching in case the answer changes.
Six engineers, 129 merged changes in a month, a demo that closes rooms. 16% of capacity touches the product customers pay for. An F that photographs like an A.
Facts sealed 2026-07-06 · window 2026-06-08 to 07-05 · every figure resolves to a record: GIT fct_m1a204CRM fct_m1e05bGIT fct_m1f930
Negative space: ticketing and runtime telemetry not connected. The questions this grade cannot answer are stated on the card, with who can. An honest gap beats a confident guess.
Sample report card, synthetic demonstration corpus. The grade is computed, not judged. How the grade is computed · See more specimens →
Findings arrive while price and terms can still move.
Start a 30-Day FindingDPA day one. Read-only. Delete after 30 days, or sooner if you ask.
For government evaluators: How Zamski works pre-award and post-award
From the Commit Up
Talent
Cross-tool calendar density drop before the resignation Slack lands. Identity-resolved across five mediums. Named in the brief.
Read on the Commit Up →AI spend
Total spend climbed three quarters in a row. License count rose. Throughput per engineer flat. The brief surfaces the cohort lines the CFO pack actually needs.
Read on the Commit Up →Governance
Three of them. Cited. Mapped to the strategic priorities they quietly displaced. Independent of the management narrative.
Read on the Commit Up →CTO AND CFO
You answer to the board every quarter. The dashboards say green but you sense slip, and the forecast sits downstream of every engineering decision. The brief is what you bring when the question is what engineering is actually doing to revenue.
Board update. FP&A close. AI spend justification. QBR.
INVESTORS
The deck says the team ships. Diligence gets two weeks and a data room. The brief reads the target's own engineering evidence, before the wire and every week after it.
Term sheet diligence. Post-close monitoring. Portfolio review. Sale prep.
GOVERNMENT
The status report says on schedule. The evidence sits in the contractor's engineering systems. The brief cites it, claim by claim, before award and after.
Source selection. Post-award oversight. COR review file.
01 · Continuous
An annual engineering diagnostic produces a snapshot dated the week consultants pack up. Three months later it is stale and the next board commitment slip is being analyzed at 1am. Zamski watches every day. The brief on the day a bridge engineer's calendar density starts to drop is the brief in which the CTO acts.
02 · Substrate
Engineering diagnostics aggregate per-tool metrics (PRs, deployments, ceremonies) and add a self-reported leadership survey. That survey asks the population the brief needs to be independent of. Zamski runs on cross-tool coordination signal, identity-resolved across five mediums.
The annual physical and the continuous heart monitor are not the same product. We are the heart monitor.
03 · Subscription
Engineering diagnostics come out of CEO discretionary budget once per year. Zamski comes out of CTO operational budget continuously. The CTO who installs Zamski owns the data and the Monday Brief. The investor or evaluator running code-up software diligence on a target buys a different read: the R&D GRADE.
Three mock companies, three commercial moments. Open one to read the full document the C-suite would receive on a Monday morning. All numbers illustrative; none of these are real customers.
Founder-written. No sales pitch. Unsubscribe in one click.
One executive finding about your engineering org that your dashboards cannot tell the board. Real data. One page. We delete it after 30 days, or sooner if you ask.
Start a 30-Day FindingDPA day one. Read-only. Delete after 30 days, or sooner if you ask.