Technical due diligence from the operating record.
Zamski shows you what you are buying before you wire the money, and whether the story still matches every quarter after. Zamski conducts technical due diligence from the target company's operating history, not the snapshot assembled in a data room. Code, messages, tickets, calendars, AI sessions. Read together, they become a record.
For private equity and venture deal teams running technical diligence, and for fund CFOs who route to them.
Consistency is no longer proof.
AI drafts the model, polishes the CIM, prepares the CTO, and reads the data room. Diligence materials agree with each other because the same tools wrote them all.
The record the target created without knowing you would examine it.
A legitimate business leaves a trail no prompt can recreate. Real customers create implementation work, support tickets, engineering requests, meetings, delays, years of ordinary activity. Zamski reads what the company created without knowing anyone would one day examine it.
Separately, these signals are noise. Read together across code, messages, tickets, calendars, and AI sessions, they become a record the CIM cannot rewrite.
In the last two years, more than one AI company has listed at a valuation over a billion dollars, reported hundreds of millions in revenue, and collapsed within months when the story met scrutiny. The documents held together. Contracts, customer profiles, and financial results all supported one another. Then investigators pulled a thread. Fake contracts. Customers that did not exist. Money moved in circles to look like revenue. In one case, prosecutors allege the fabrication exceeded 90 percent of reported revenue, and maintaining it took seven people six years. Now the same consistency is available with a prompt. A fabricated story needs everyone to stay consistent. A real business is consistent without anyone trying.
What the sealed report states.
Every sealed report answers three questions. The triad is the shape of the deliverable and the honesty contract that comes with it.
What the record confirmed.
What the record contradicted.
What we could not observe.
Missing operating evidence is not a gap. It is a finding. It is grounds to reprice, change terms, require protections, or walk away.
Where the report changes the transaction.
A contradiction changes the price before the money moves. A confirmation lets you underwrite what others must discount.
Reports are sealed and source-linked. Every claim resolves to a specific artifact in the target's own systems, defensible to an investment committee, to lenders, and to insurers reviewing representations and warranties.
Before the wire
The pre-close report
One sealed report on the target's engineering organization, produced from access the target grants under a DPA on day one. Read-only. Scoped to the evaluation window. Delivered before the money moves.
Findings that move price and terms
Every finding cites a specific artifact in the target's own systems. Findings that surface before close change what the deal team walks in with, from valuation to reps and warranties.
Every quarter after
You ask a question. Zamski answers from the company's own systems and keeps watching in case the answer changes.
Continuous monitoring
The same substrate keeps reading after close. The story that closed the deal either stays consistent with the operating record week over week, or it does not. Divergence surfaces early enough to intervene.
Portfolio and sale prep
A read across the portfolio built on the same substrate. When it is time to sell, the file is already assembled from real evidence rather than reconstructed under time pressure.
Related
See how the sealed report reads on synthetic companies at /samples. Method notes at /methodology. Security posture at /security.